× Stakeholder Participation for Legitimate Priority Setting: A Checklist

× HTA Agencies Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes Comment on “Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around the Globe”

× Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Legitimate Health Benefit Package Design − Part I: Conceptual Framework

× Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design – Part II: A Practical Guide

× Legitimacy of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels: Controversy Over the Deployment of the Nutri-Score in Italy

× Challenges and Opportunities for Deliberative Processes for Healthcare Decision-Making Comment on “Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design – Part II: A Practical Guide”

× Three Approaches to Improve a Practical Guide on Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design Comment on “Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design – Part II: A Practical Guide”

× Moral and Social Values in Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design Comment on “Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design – Part II: A Practical Guide”

× Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for UHC: Progress, Potential and Prudence Comment on “Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design – Part II: A Practical Guide”