Abstract
Background: In the attempt to move towards universal health coverage (UHC), many low- and middle-income countries
(LMICs) are actively seeking to contract-out non-state providers (NSPs) to deliver health services to a specified
population. Research on contracting-out has focused more on the impact of contracting-out than on the actual processes
underlying the intervention and contextual factors that influence its performance. This paper reports on perceptions of
stakeholders on contracting-out faith-based hospitals through service agreements (SAs) to provide primary healthcare
services in Tanzania.
Methods: We adopted a qualitative descriptive case study design. Qualitative research tools included document review
and in-depth interviews with key informants, and data were analysed using a thematic approach.
Results: Stakeholders reported mixed perceptions on the SA. The government considered the SA as an important
mechanism for improving access to primary healthcare services where there were no public hospitals. The faith-based
hospitals viewed the SA as a means of overcoming serious budget and human resource constraints as a result of the
tightening funding environment. However, constant delays in disbursement of funds, mistrust among partners, and
ineffective contract enforcement mechanisms resulted into negative perceptions of the SA.
Conclusion: SAs between local governments and faith-based hospitals were perceived to be important by both parties.
However, in order to implement SAs effectively, the districts should diversify the sources of financing the contracts. In
addition, the government and the faith-based organizations should continually engage in dialogue so as to build more
trust between the partners involved in the SA. Furthermore, the central government needs to play a greater role in
building the capacity of district and regional level actors in monitoring the implementation of the SA.