WHO FCTC as a Pioneering and Learning Instrument Comment on "The Legal Strength of International Health Instruments - What It Brings to Global Health Governance?"

Pekka Puska ^1,2,3 *

Cited by CrossRef:

1- Pavlikova B, van Dijk J. The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in Slovakia and in Finland: one law, two different practices?. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2020;20(1) [Crossref]

2- Glahn A, Kyriakos C, Radu Loghin C, Nguyen D, Starchenko P, Jimenez-Ruiz C, Faure M, Ward B. Tobacco control achievements and priority areas in the WHO Europe Region: A review. Tob Prev Cessation. 2018;4(April) [Crossref]

3- Charoenca N, Kungskulniti N, Sritabutra D, Pitayarangsarit S, Hamann S. Using an Assessment Tool to Further Tobacco Control Accomplishment in Thailand. Tob Use Insights. 2018;11 [Crossref]

4- Kungskulniti N, Pitayarangsarit S, Hamann S. Stakeholder’s Assessment of the Awareness and Effectiveness of Smoke-free Law in Thailand. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(10):919 [Crossref]

5- Forberger S, Khan Z, Ahmad F, Ahmed F, Frense J, Kampfmann T, Ullah S, Dogar O, Siddiqi K, Zeeb H. Scoping Review of Existing Evaluations of Smokeless Tobacco Control Policies: What Is Known About Countries Covered, Level of Jurisdictions, Target Groups Studied, and Instruments Evaluated?. 2022;24(9):1344 [Crossref]

6- Hoffmann M. The power of WHO epistemic communities: The “tobacco epidemic” as construct. Politics & Policy. 2024;52(3):520 [Crossref]

7- Pavlikova B, Freel L, van Dijk J. Compliance with the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in Slovakia and in Finland: Two Different Worlds. IJERPH. 2020;17(18):6661 [Crossref]

Submit Your Paper Archive