Logo-ijhpm
Int J Health Policy Manag. Inpress.
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8150
  Abstract View: 18

Original Article

Association of Launch Price and Clinical Value With Reimbursement Decisions for Anticancer Drugs in China

Jing Zhou 1,2, Hao Lu 3, Jay Pan 1,4*

1 HEOA Group, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
2 Institute for Healthy Cities and West China Research Center for Rural Health Development, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
3 School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
4 School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
*Corresponding Author: Correspondence to: Jay Pan; , Email: panjie.jay@scu.edu.cn

Abstract

Background: To investigate the association of launch price and clinical value with reimbursement decisions for anticancer drugs after the implementation of reimbursement-linked price negotiation in China.

Methods: Anticancer drugs approved by the NMPA of China from January 2017 to June 2022 were eligible for inclusion. Approval and reimbursement dates of included drug indications were retrieved from publicly available resources. We collected measures of clinical value, including survival, quality of life, and overall response rate from pivotal clinical trials and calculated treatment price at launch. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were employed to estimate the association between launch price, clinical value, and reimbursement decisions of anticancer drugs in China.

Results: The median reimbursement lag was 579 days (IQR: 402 - 936) for 93 indications supported by randomized controlled trials and 637 days (IQR 373 - 858) for 42 indications supported by single-arm clinical trials. Reimbursement was granted to 60 (65%) and 23 (55%) indications supported by randomized controlled and single-arm clinical trials, respectively. The launch price of anticancer drugs was not associated with reimbursement decisions in multivariate regression analyses. Indications supported by randomized controlled trials with higher clinical value were more likely to be reimbursed (HR for survival=1.07, 95%CI: 1.00 -1.15, p = 0.037), while the overall response rate of indications supported by single-arm clinical trials was not associated with the likelihood of being reimbursed (HR = 2.09, 95%CI: 0.14 - 32.28, p = 0.595).

Conclusion: The launch price of anticancer drugs may not have a significant impact on reimbursement decisions, while the implementation of reimbursement-linked price negotiation in China has prioritized anticancer drugs with higher clinical value, but only for indications supported by randomized controlled trials. Efforts are needed to prioritize indications supported by single-arm clinical trials that have higher value during the process of price negotiation.


Please cite this article as: Zhou J, Lu H, Pan J. Association of launch price and clinical value with reimbursement decisions for anticancer drugs in China. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;x(x):x–x. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8150
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 19

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 0

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 05 Jun 2023
Accepted: 16 Mar 2024
ePublished: 17 Mar 2024
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)