Logo-ijhpm
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12: 6640.
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6640
PMID: 37579485
PMCID: PMC10125049
  Abstract View: 15
  PDF Download: 10

Original Article

Explaining Variations in Long-term Care Use and Expenditures Under the Public Long-term Care Insurance Systems: A Case Study Comparison of Korea and Japan

Hongsoo Kim 1,2 ORCID logo, Nan-He Yoon 3 ORCID logo, Youjin Hahn 4 ORCID logo, Hideki Hashimoto 5* ORCID logo

1 Graduate School of Public Health Department of Public Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Environment & Institute of Aging, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
2 SOCIUM - Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
3 Division of Social Welfare and Health Administration, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Republic of Korea.
4 School of Economics, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
5 Department of Health and Social Behavior, The University of Tokyo School of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan.
*Corresponding Author: Correspondence to: Hideki Hashimoto Email: , Email: hidehashim@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Abstract

Background: Establishing universal coverage of formal long-term care (LTC) services is an urgent policy need for aging populations that requires efficient management of quality and financing. Although current variation in LTC service use between and within countries suggests the potential for improvement by efficient management, this topic remains underexamined. We aimed to identify the sources of variance in LTC use and expenditures through a unique cross-country comparison of Japan and South Korea, which have formal public LTC insurance (LTCI) schemes that are analogous but have unique operational and demographic structures.

Methods: Taking administrative regions as the unit of analysis, we assembled data on the LTC utilization rate of people aged ≥65 years, and expenditures per recipient from 2013 to 2015 as the outcome variables. Explanatory variables included demand-related factors, such as regional demographic and economic conditions, and supply characteristics derived from existing public databases. We conducted weighted least squares regression with fixed effects for the pooled data and used Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition to identify sources of outcome variance between the two countries.

Results: The average LTC utilization rate was 6.8% in Korea and 18.2% in Japan. Expenditures per recipient were approximately 1.4 times higher in Japan than in Korea. The difference in the utilization rate was mostly explained by between-country differences in supply- and demand-related factors, whereas the difference in expenditures per recipient was largely attributed to unobserved country-specific factors.

Conclusion: The current findings suggest that LTC utilization is determined largely by the demographic and functional characteristics of older people, whereas expenditures are more likely affected by institutional factors such as the insurance governance scheme and the policy choice of the target population segment and coverage. The results suggest that strategic choice of LTC institutional schemes is required to ensure financial sustainability to meet changing demands caused by population aging.


Citation: Kim H, Yoon NH, Hahn Y, Hashimoto H. Explaining variations in long-term care use and expenditures under the public long-term care insurance systems: a case study comparison of Korea and Japan. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:6640. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6640
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 16

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 10

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 21 Jul 2021
Accepted: 17 Oct 2022
ePublished: 19 Nov 2022
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)