Logo-ijhpm
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(12): 3079-3089.
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6234
PMID: 35964163
PMCID: PMC10105173
  Abstract View: 10
  PDF Download: 8

Original Article

Assessment of Strategic Healthcare Purchasing Arrangements and Functions Towards Universal Coverage in Tanzania

August Kuwawenaruwa* ORCID logo, Suzan Makawia, Peter Binyaruka ORCID logo, Fatuma Manzi

1 Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
*Corresponding Author: Correspondence to: August Kuwawenaruwa Email: , Email: ajoachim@ihi.or.tz

Abstract

Background: Strategic health purchasing in low- and middle-income countries has received substantial attention as countries aim to achieve universal health coverage (UHC), by ensuring equitable access to quality health services without the risk of financial hardship. There is little evidence published from Tanzania on purchasing arrangements and what is required for strategic purchasing. This study analyses three purchasing arrangements in Tanzania and gives recommendations to strengthen strategic purchasing in Tanzania.

Methods: We used the multi-case qualitative study drawing on the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF), Social Health Insurance Benefit (SHIB), and improved Community Health Fund (iCHF) to explore the three purchasing arrangements with a purchaser-provider split. Data were drawn from document reviews and results were validated with nine key informant (KI) interviews with a range of actors involved in strategic purchasing. A deductive and inductive approach was used to develop the themes and framework analysis to summarize the data.

Results: The findings show that benefit selection for all three schemes was based on the standard treatment guidelines issued by the Ministry of Health. Selection-contracting of the private healthcare providers are based on the location of the provider, the range of services available as stipulated in the scheme guideline, and the willingness of the provider to be contracted. NHF uses fee-for-service to reimburse providers. While SHIB and iCHF use capitation. NHIF has an electronic system to monitor registration, verification, claims processing, and referrals. While SHIB monitoring is done through routine supportive supervision and for the iCHF provider performance is monitored through utilization rates.

Conclusion: Enforcing compliance with the contractual agreement between providers-purchasers is crucial for the provision of quality services in an efficient manner. Investment in a routine monitoring system, such as the use of the district health information system which allows effective tracking of healthcare service delivery, and broader population healthcare outcomes.


Citation: Kuwawenaruwa A, Makawia S, Binyaruka P, Manzi F. Assessment of strategic healthcare purchasing arrangements and functions towards universal coverage in Tanzania. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(12):3079– 3089. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6234
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 11

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 8

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 14 Apr 2021
Accepted: 13 Jul 2022
ePublished: 01 Aug 2022
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)