Logo-ijhpm
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(9): 1863-1873.
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.95
PMID: 34634879
PMCID: PMC9808214
  Abstract View: 16
  PDF Download: 13

Original Article

Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity

Peter Gelius 1* ORCID logo, Sven Messing 1 ORCID logo, Antonina Tcymbal 1 ORCID logo, Stephen Whiting 2 ORCID logo, João Breda 2 ORCID logo, Karim Abu-Omar 1 ORCID logo

1 Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
2 WHO European Office for Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Moscow, Russia.
*Corresponding Author: Correspondence to: Peter Gelius Email: , Email: peter.gelius@fau.de

Abstract

Background: Policy is an important element of influencing individual health-related behaviours associated to major risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as smoking, alcohol consumption, unhealthy eating and physical inactivity. However, our understanding of the specific measures recommended in NCD prevention policy-making remains limited. This study analysed recent World Health Organization (WHO) documents to identify common policy instruments suggested for national NCD prevention policy and to assess similarities and differences between policies targeting different health-related behaviours.

Methods: Evert Vedung’s typology of policy instruments, which differentiates between regulatory, economic/ fiscal and soft instruments, served as a basis for this analysis. A systematic search on WHO websites was conducted to identify documents relating to tobacco, alcohol, nutrition and physical activity. The staff of the respective units at the WHO Regional Office for Europe conducted an expert validation of these documents. The resulting documents were systematically searched for policy instruments. A word frequency analysis was conducted to estimate the use of individual instruments in the different policy fields, followed by an additional in-depth coding and content analysis by two independent reviewers.

Results: Across all health-related behaviours, the following policy instruments were suggested most frequently in WHO guidance documents: laws, regulations, standards, taxes, prices, campaigns, recommendations, partnerships and coordination. The analysis showed that regulatory and economic/fiscal policy instruments are mainly applied in tobacco and alcohol policy, while soft instruments dominate in the fields of nutrition and especially physical activity.

Conclusion: The study confirms perceived differences regarding recommended policy instruments in the different policy fields and supports arguments that “harder” instruments still appear to be underutilized in nutrition and physical activity. However, more comprehensive research is needed, especially with respect to actual instrument use and effectiveness in national-level NCD prevention policy.


Citation: Gelius P, Messing S, Tcymbal A, Whiting S, Breda J, Abu-Omar K. Policy instruments for health promotion: a comparison of WHO policy guidance for tobacco, alcohol, nutrition and physical activity. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(9):1863–1873. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2021.95
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 17

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 13

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 02 Nov 2020
Accepted: 24 Jul 2021
ePublished: 25 Aug 2021
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)