Logo-ijhpm
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(4): 349-352.
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.95
PMID: 29626403
PMCID: PMC5949226
  Abstract View: 11
  PDF Download: 7

Commentary

Providers and Patients Caught Between Standardization and Individualization: Individualized Standardization as a Solution Comment on “(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”

Lena Ansmann 1*, Holger Pfaff 1

1 Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
*Corresponding Author: *Correspondence to: Lena Ansmann Email: , Email: lena.ansmann@uk-koeln.de

Abstract

In their 2017 article, Mannion and Exworthy provide a thoughtful and theory-based analysis of two parallel trends in modern healthcare systems and their competing and conflicting logics: standardization and customization. This commentary further discusses the challenge of treatment decision-making in times of evidence-based medicine (EBM), shared decision-making and personalized medicine. From the perspective of systems theory, we propose the concept of individualized standardization as a solution to the problem. According to this concept, standardization is conceptualized as a guiding framework leaving room for individualization in the patient physician interaction. The theoretical background is the concept of context management according to systems theory. Moreover, the comment suggests multidisciplinary teams as a possible solution for the integration of standardization and individualization, using the example of multidisciplinary tumor conferences and highlighting its limitations. The comment also supports the authors’ statement of the patient as co-producer and introduces the idea that the competing logics of standardization and individualization are a matter of perspective on macro, meso and micro levels.

Citation: Ansmann L, Pfaff H. Providers and patients caught between standardization and individualization: individualized standardization as a solution: Comment on “(Re) Making the procrustean bed? Standardization and customization as competing logics in healthcare.” Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(4):349–352. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.95 
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 12

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 7

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 14 Jun 2017
Accepted: 01 Aug 2017
ePublished: 12 Aug 2017
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)