Logo-ijhpm
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(8): 1482-1488.
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.56
PMID: 34273921
PMCID: PMC9808326
  Abstract View: 13
  PDF Download: 10

Original Article

The Regulation of the Complementary Health Sector: General Public’s Knowledge of Complementary Medicine-Related Quality Assurance and Consumer Protection

David Sibbritt 1* ORCID logo, Wenbo Peng 1 ORCID logo, Jon Wardle 1, Cameron Stewart 2, Paul Komesaroff 3, Jon Adams 1

1 Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
2 Sydney Law School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
3 Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
*Corresponding Author: Correspondence to: David Sibbritt Email: , Email: David.Sibbritt@uts.edu.au

Abstract

Background: Complementary medicine (CM) use is a ubiquitous aspect of an increasingly consumer-driven model of healthcare delivery and plays an increasingly prominent role in the Australian health sector. Yet there is limited empirical research investigating the quality and integrity of protections for consumers in Australia. The aim of this study is to help address this gap in knowledge by exploring how members of the public engage with protection mechanisms related to CM use.

Methods: This study utilised a cross-sectional online survey to recruit a sample of 1132 Australian adults aged 18 and over. Purposive convenience sampling was used to recruit participants from an existing database of Australian adults who had expressed interest in participating in research.

Results: The majority of the participants (64.0%) had visited a CM practitioner in their lifetime. However, a minority of participants (36.9%) indicated they would feel confident in knowing where to complain if something went wrong with the treatment they received from a CM practitioner. Most participants (74.7%) had used a CM product in their lifetime. Specifically, 32.3% had ‘ever’ used an herbal product and 69.9% had ‘ever’ used a nutritional supplement. However, a minority of participants (32.7%) indicated they would feel confident knowing where to complain if something went wrong with a herbal or nutritional supplement they used. Most participants indicated a lack of knowledge about how CM practitioners and CM products are regulated in Australia.

Conclusion: The findings of this study clearly highlight a concerning lack of knowledge by CM patients and consumers regarding the regulation of CM in Australia. From a policy perspective, it is necessary to seek proactive approaches that target complaint-related knowledge of the CM patients and consumers through education and advocacy efforts.


Citation: Sibbritt D, Peng W, Wardle J, Stewart C, Komesaroff P, Adams J. The regulation of the complementary health sector: general public’s knowledge of complementary medicine-related quality assurance and consumer protection. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(8):1482–1488. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2021.56
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 14

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 10

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 17 Feb 2020
Accepted: 30 Apr 2021
ePublished: 09 Jun 2021
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)