Logo-ijhpm
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(7): 1047-1057.
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.256
PMID: 33590740
PMCID: PMC9808191
  Abstract View: 13
  PDF Download: 11

Original Article

Barriers to Equitable Public Participation in Health-System Priority Setting Within the Context of Decentralization: The Case of Vulnerable Women in a Ugandan District

S. Donya Razavi 1* ORCID logo, Lydia Kapiriri 2 ORCID logo, Julia Abelson 3 ORCID logo, Michael Wilson 4 ORCID logo

1 Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
2 Department of Health, Aging and Society, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
3 Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
4 Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster Health Forum, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
*Corresponding Author: Correspondence to: S. Donya Razavi Email: , Email: razavisd@mcmaster.ca

Abstract

Background: Decentralization of healthcare decision-making in Uganda led to the promotion of public participation. To facilitate this, participatory structures have been developed at sub-national levels. However, the degree to which the participation structures have contributed to improving the participation of vulnerable populations, specifically vulnerable women, remains unclear. We aim to understand whether and how vulnerable women participate in health-system priority setting; identify any barriers to vulnerable women’s participation; and to establish how the barriers to vulnerable women’s participation can be addressed.

Methods: We used a qualitative description study design involving interviews with district decision-makers (n=12), sub-county leaders (n=10), and vulnerable women (n=35) living in Tororo District, Uganda. Data was collected between May and June 2017. The analysis was conducting using an editing analysis style.

Results: The vulnerable women expressed interest in participating in priority setting, believing they would make valuable contributions. However, both decision-makers and vulnerable women reported that vulnerable women did not consistently participate in decision-making, despite participatory structures that were instituted through decentralization. There are financial (transportation and lack of incentives), biomedical (illness/disability and menstruation), knowledge-based (lack of knowledge and/or information about participation), motivational (perceived disinterest, lack of feedback, and competing needs), socio-cultural (lack of decision-making power), and structural (hunger and poverty) barriers which hamper vulnerable women’s participation.

Conclusion: The identified barriers hinder vulnerable women’s participation in health-system priority setting. Some of the barriers could be addressed through the existing decentralization participatory structures. Respondents made both short-term, feasible recommendations and more systemic, ideational recommendations to improve vulnerable women’s participation. Integrating the vulnerable women’s creative and feasible ideas to enhance their participation in health-system decision-making should be prioritized.


Citation: Razavi SD, Kapiriri L, Abelson J, Wilson M. Barriers to equitable public participation in health-system priority setting within the context of decentralization: the case of vulnerable women in a Ugandan district. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(7):1047–1057. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2020.256
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 14

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 11

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 31 Jan 2020
Accepted: 09 Dec 2020
ePublished: 26 Dec 2020
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)