Logo-ijhpm
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020;9(10): 439-447.
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2020.01
PMID: 32610741
PMCID: PMC7719214
  Abstract View: 15
  PDF Download: 11

Original Article

Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand

Waranya Rattanavipapong 1* ORCID logo, Ritika Kapoor 2, Yot Teerawattananon 1,2, Jos Luttjeboer 3, Siobhan Botwright 4, Rachel A. Archer 1, Birgitte Giersing 4, Raymond C. W. Hutubessy 4

1 Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
2 Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
3 Asc Academics, Groningen, The Netherlands.
4 World Health Organization (WHO), Genève, Switzerland.
*Corresponding Author: *Correspondence to: Waranya Rattanavipapong Email:, Email: waranya.r@hitap.net

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed the Total System Effectiveness (TSE) framework to assist national policy-makers in prioritizing vaccines. The pilot was launched in Thailand to explore the potential use of TSE in a country with established governance structures and accountable decision-making processes for immunization policy. While the existing literature informs vaccine adoption decisions in GAVI-eligible countries, this study attempts to address a gap in the literature by examining the policy process of a non-GAVI eligible country.

Methods: A rotavirus vaccine (RVV) test case was used to compare the decision criteria made by the existing processes (Expanded Program on Immunization [EPI], and National List of Essential Medicines [NLEM]) for vaccine prioritization and the TSE-pilot model, using Thailand specific data.

Results: The existing decision-making processes in Thailand and TSE were found to offer similar recommendations on the selection of a RVV product.

Conclusion: The authors believe that TSE can provide a well-reasoned and step by step approach for countries, especially low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), to develop a systematic and transparent decision-making process for immunization policy.


Citation: Rattanavipapong W, Kapoor R, Teerawattananon Y, et al. Comparing 3 approaches for making vaccine adoption decisions in Thailand. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020;9(10):439–447. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2020.01
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 16

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 11

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 10 May 2019
Accepted: 01 Jan 2020
ePublished: 20 Jan 2020
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)