Sandra C. Buttigieg
1,2*
1 Department of Health Services Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
2 Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, College of Social Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Abstract
The insights from an international scoping review provided by Lehoux et al challenge health policy-makers,
entrepreneurs/innovators and users of healthcare, worldwide, to be aware of equity and sustainability challenges
at system-level when appraising responsible innovation in health (RIH) – purposefully designed to better support
health systems.The authors manage to extract no less than 1391 health system challenges with those mostly cited
pertaining to service delivery, human resources, leadership and governance. Countries were classified according
to the Human Development Index (HDI), while the authors decided not to classify according to the types of
health systems justifying this on the basis that the articles reviewed studied a specific setting within a broader
national or regional health system. The article presents highly powerful and discerning viewpoints, indeed
providing numerous standpoints, yet in a comprehensive manner, thereby putting structure to a somewhat
highly complex and multidimensional subject. This commentary brings forth several considerations that are
perceived on reading this article. First, although innovation strategies are important for the dynamicity of
health systems, one should discuss whether or not RIH can adequately address equity and sustainability on a
global scale. Secondly, RIH across countries should also be debated in the context of the principles garnered by
the type of health system, thereby identifying whether or not the prevailing political goals support equity and
sustainability, and whether or not policy-makers are adequately supported to translate system-level demand
signals into innovation development opportunities. As key messages, the commentary reiterates the emphasis
made by the authors of the need for international policy-oriented fora as learning vehicles on RIH that also
address system-level challenges, albeit the need to acknowledge cultural differences. In addition, the public has
not only the right for transparency on how equity and sustainability challenges are addressed in innovation
decisions, but also the responsibilities to contribute to overcome these challenges.