Logo-ijhpm
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(7): 444-446.
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.25
PMID: 31441280
PMCID: PMC6706970
  Abstract View: 14
  PDF Download: 11

Commentary

The Need for a Dynamic Approach to Health SystemCentered Innovations Comment on “What Health System Challenges Should Responsible Innovation in Health Address? Insights From an International Scoping Review”

Josefien van Olmen 1,2* ORCID logo, Bruno Marchal 1, Button Ricarte 1, Wim Van Damme 1, Sara Van Belle 1

1 Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
2 Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
*Corresponding Author: *Correspondence to: Josefien van Olmen Email: , Email: josefien.vanolmen@uantwerpen.be

Abstract

Lehoux and colleagues plea for a health systems perspective to evaluate innovations. Since many innovations and their scale-up strategies emerge from processes that are not (centrally) steered, we plea for any assessment with a dynamic, instead of a sequential, approach. We provide further guidance on how to adopt such dynamic approach, in order to better un-derstand and steer innovations for better health systems. A systems-level challenge is constituted by interactions and feedback loops between different actors and components of the health system. It is therefore essential to explore both the entry-point of innovation and the interactions with other components. If innovation is regarded as an injection of resources and opportunities into a health system, this system needs to have the capacity to transform these into desired outputs, the ‘absorption capacity.’ The highly organic diffusion of innovation in complex adapative systems cannot be easily controlled, but the system behaviours can be analysed, with occurance of phenomena such as path dependence, feedback loops, scale-free networks, emergent behaviour and phase transitions. This helps to anticipate unintended consequences, and to engage key actors in ongoing problem-solving and adaptation. By adopting a prospective approach, responsible innovation could set in motion prospective policy evaluations, which on the basis of iterative learning would allow decisionmakers to continuously adapt their policies and programmes. Priority-setting for innovation is an essentially political process that is geared towards consensus-building and grounded in values.

Citation: van Olmen J, Marchal B, Ricarte B, Van Damme W, Van Belle S. The need for a dynamic approach to health system-centered innovations: Comment on “What health system challenges should responsible innovation in health address? Insights from an international scoping review.” Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(7):444–446. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2019.25
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 15

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 11

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 10 Mar 2019
Accepted: 27 Apr 2019
ePublished: 26 May 2019
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)