Logo-ijhpm
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(6): 378-380.
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.16
PMID: 31256570
PMCID: PMC6600020
  Abstract View: 11
  PDF Download: 8

Commentary

Patient Engagement and its Evaluation Tools – Current Challenges and Future Directions Comment on “Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review”

Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi 1* ORCID logo, Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun 2,3, France Légaré 4,5

1 Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
2 Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation Component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
3 Université Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
4 Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
5 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, QC, Canada.
*Corresponding Author: *Correspondence to: Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi Email:, Email: samira.rahimi@mcgill.ca

Abstract

Considering the growing recognition of the importance of patient engagement in healthcare decisions, research and delivery systems, it is important to ensure high quality and efficient patient engagement evaluation tools. In this commentary, we will first highlight the definition and importance of patient engagement. Then we discuss the psychometric properties of the patient engagement evaluation tools identified in a recent review on patient engagement in healthcare organization- and system-level decision-making. Lastly, we suggest future directions for patient engagement and its evaluation tools.

Citation: Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi S, Zomahoun HTV, Légaré F. Patient engagement and its evaluation tools– current challenges and future directions: Comment on “Metrics and evaluation tools for patient engagement in healthcare organization- and system-level decision-making: a systematic review.” Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(6):378–380. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2019.16
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 12

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 8

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 16 Nov 2018
Accepted: 03 Mar 2019
ePublished: 19 Mar 2019
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)