Zackary Berger
1,2*1 Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA;
2 Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
In a rigorous systematic review, Dukhanin and colleagues categorize metrics and evaluative tools of the
engagement of patient, public, consumer, and community in decision-making in healthcare institutions and
systems. The review itself is ably done and the categorizations lead to a useful understanding of the necessary
elements of engagement, and a suite of measures relevant to implementing engagement in systems. Nevertheless,
the question remains whether the engagement of patient representatives in institutional or systemic deliberations
will lead to improved clinical outcomes or increased engagement of individual patients themselves in care.
Attention to the conceptual foundations of patient engagement would help make this systematic review relevant
to the clinical care of patients.