Gregory L. Peck
1*, Joseph S. Hanna
11 Department of Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Abstract
In 2015, the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery (LCoGS) working groups developed a National Surgical,
Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP) framework to guide national surgical system development globally
predicated on six data points (indicators) which can assess surgical systems. Zambia as well as other subSaharan
Africa (SSA) countries have forged ahead in designing and implementing interventions based on
LCoGS indicators collected to inform NSOAP. Concurrently, the Zambian team and others have recognized
the need for rigorous scientific inquiry to assess and iteratively improve upon the NSOAP process and outputs.
Based on the Zambian experience, as well as that of ours in Colombia, we have identified “core principles”
through convergent works which inform a scientific framework through which NSOAP can be evaluated. We
propose that when contextualized, participatory action research (PAR) and dissemination and implementation
science are methodologies upon which a robust framework can be developed to achieving objective and iterative
NSOAP evaluation, and ultimately universal health coverage as envisioned by the World Health Organization
(WHO)